From the floor in Xi'an: 9 posters, one theme
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 2 of 5 of this archive, newest first.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
An in-use period is established by a dedicated study on a specific formulation in a specific container at a specific concentration. Borrowing one from a marketed product is…
Three different explanations for the same abnormal number, and how to tell them apart.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
An isoaspartate rearrangement changes the molecule and not the mass. A method that confirms identity by molecular weight alone will report it as the parent compound.
We set out what is known, what is inferred and what is simply assumed about the fortnight after a vial is opened.
The compartment called lean mass contains water, glycogen, viscera and skin. Only some of it is the tissue anybody is worried about.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Constipation is the most tractable of the effects and the most consistently under-managed.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What the SURPASS and STEP programmes reported, with the estimands and the baseline values stated.
An orthogonal method separates on a different physical principle, so that species co-eluting in the first are likely to resolve in the second. Two runs of the same method at…
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The result is unremarkable. What the report states alongside it is not.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
A catalogue of open questions, with an assessment of how likely each is to be resolved.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The two ionisation techniques in general use produce different charge distributions, different adducts and different failure modes. Certificates almost never say which was…
The trials measured mass. Nobody measured whether the participants got weaker.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
What the pharmacokinetic data supports about dose timing, missed doses and interruption.
The header identifies the batch, the table records the tests, and the footer says who is answerable. Two of the three are usually incomplete.