The named comparison we promised two years ago
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
The economics: list price against negotiated price, the cost of goods against the cost of a prescription, prior authorisation and appeal outcomes, and the arithmetic a cash-paying patient is actually doing.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What was withdrawn, from whom, after how long, and what was measured afterwards.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
Chain of custody, in a regulated setting, begins at sampling. Here it begins when the package arrives.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The trials studied planned withdrawal. Almost nobody stops that way.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The condition on arrival is recorded by some services and not others, and it is one of the more informative lines in a report.