PIONEER 6 misses on a secondary endpoint the coverage has not mentioned
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 44 of 68 of this archive, newest first.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The regulated world states the method, the instrument, the convention and the tolerance. This market states a verdict.
Insulin syringes are graduated in units on a convention that fixes 100 units to one millilitre. That convention says nothing about how much peptide is in a unit, and…
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
A small number of serious gastrointestinal events occur in people taking these drugs. Distinguishing them from the expected effect profile is the most consequential…
Weight reduction in the long programmes flattens at roughly sixty to seventy-two weeks. The timing is consistent, predictable and almost never mentioned in advance.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The limit for a parenteral product is calculable from the dose and the body weight in two lines. Almost nobody in this trade performs the calculation.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
We asked all four services what they can determine, on what timescale, at what price, and under what accreditation. The answers are printed in full.
These agents produce no dependence and no withdrawal syndrome. What a taper would be for is therefore a real question rather than an obvious one.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The ionisation method determines the charge states you see, the adducts you must account for, and the modifications you might destroy in the process.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
A robust, cheap, standardised assay with a specific and well-catalogued set of failure modes, several of which are common in this population.