South Africa pharmacy body issues counselling standards for tirzepatide initiation
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 44 of 68 of this archive, newest first.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Weight loss reduces bone mineral density at load-bearing sites. Whether that translates into fractures in this population is unmeasured.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
An isoaspartate rearrangement changes the molecule and not the mass. A method that confirms identity by molecular weight alone will report it as the parent compound.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A small number of serious gastrointestinal events occur in people taking these drugs. Distinguishing them from the expected effect profile is the most consequential…
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A result on one vial generalises to a batch only if the vial was drawn in a way that makes it representative — and nobody records how it was drawn.
Matching a retention time against a standard is evidence of consistency, not proof of identity. Two different species can elute at the same time on one method.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
We work through a single chromatogram twice, under two integration conventions, and show where the difference comes from.
Dose reduction is not withdrawal, and the trials that tested withdrawal cannot be read as testing it.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The report states the gradient, the wavelength and the integration threshold, which is more than most.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The trials studied planned withdrawal. Almost nobody stops that way.