Argentina caps exenatide prescribing to 16 specialist centres
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 114 of 170 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A survey of what the meta-analyses support, with the populations named.
The recommendation survives scrutiny. The reasoning offered for it frequently does not.
The graduation interval differs between barrel sizes, and a 1 mL barrel is frequently marked in two-unit steps. Reading one as though it were marked in single units halves…
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
One randomised trial has combined a GLP-1 receptor agonist with supervised exercise. Its result is the single most useful piece of evidence in this area.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Roughly four to seven per cent of trial participants discontinued for adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal, mostly during escalation. That is the empirical size of the…
The absence of microbiological capability in this market is a commercial fact with a straightforward explanation, and it is worth understanding before blaming anybody for it.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
We asked twenty companies three questions about stability data and print every answer, refusal and non-response.
A catalogue of open questions, with an assessment of how likely each is to be resolved.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Cost is the modal reason for discontinuation in every dataset we have seen, and it is absent from the clinical literature.
The recommendation survives scrutiny. The reasoning offered for it frequently does not.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.