Holograms, QR codes and other things that are not verification
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 20 of 170 of this archive, newest first.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Deamidation, oxidation, aggregation and hydrolysis account for nearly all of what happens to a peptide over time. Each has a characteristic residue, a characteristic…
A plateau at an intermediate dose and a plateau at the maximum dose look identical from the outside and mean different things.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
A reminder that a purity figure is the output of a method, and that methods differ.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
A substantial proportion of the abnormal results generated during rapid weight loss are consequences of the weight loss rather than findings about the person.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
Dietary measures are widely recommended, plausible on mechanism, and supported mainly by observational data and clinical experience.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The composition data comes from imaging substudies enrolling a few score participants at selected sites. It is the best evidence available and it is thin.
For licensed products the in-use period is established by stability data. For a peptide reconstituted at home there is no such data, and the honest answer is that nobody…
Receptor pharmacology explains more of the clinical picture than the dose does — and almost none of it appears in the material patients are given.
The result is unremarkable. What the report omits is not.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A shallow gradient resolves impurities that a steep one runs into the parent peak. Both methods are legitimate; only one of them can see the small stuff.