From the floor in Shanghai: 8 posters, one theme
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 91 of 170 of this archive, newest first.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The report states the gradient, the wavelength and the integration threshold, which is more than most.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Bioburden entering the filter, filter integrity, environmental monitoring and aseptic process simulation are the four pillars. The trade documents none of them.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A reminder that a purity figure is the output of a method, and that methods differ.
Almost every practical recommendation in circulation was established in a population that does not resemble the people now following it.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
The trials studied planned withdrawal. Almost nobody stops that way.
What a slow reduction could plausibly buy, and what it certainly cannot prevent.
Three compendial method families are in routine use and a fourth, based on a recombinant enzyme rather than crab lysate, is now compendial in its own right.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The result is unremarkable. What the report omits is not.
An orthogonal method separates on a different physical principle, so that species co-eluting in the first are likely to resolve in the second. Two runs of the same method at…
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The result is unremarkable. What the report omits is not.
One randomised trial has combined a GLP-1 receptor agonist with supervised exercise. Its result is the single most useful piece of evidence in this area.
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Follow the resin, not the catalogue.