What the new Ireland guidance says about stopping
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Practice Dispatch
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The pharmacy regulator in Canada has issued counselling standards for initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy, specifying what must be covered at the point of supply: device technique, expected adverse effects, what to do about a missed dose, storage, sharps disposal, and — notably — what happens if treatment stops.
The titration document sets out three permissible responses to unresolved symptoms at a given dose: hold at the current dose for a further interval, return to the previous dose, or discontinue. It declines to specify a maximum hold duration, on the stated grounds that no evidence supports one.
The evidence base for most practical questions in this field is thin, and the better guidance documents say so explicitly rather than manufacturing a recommendation grade. The Journal reports the stated evidence quality alongside the recommendation, because a strong recommendation on low-quality evidence is a different object from a strong recommendation on high-quality evidence.
Ndidi Achebe, regulatory affairs consultant, noted who the document does not reach. "None of my patients who buy online will ever see this. That population is entirely outside the guidance system."
We have asked the issuing body whether the guidance will be reviewed on a fixed cycle and what would trigger an earlier revision.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Insulin syringes are graduated in units on a convention that fixes 100 units to one millilitre. That convention says nothing about how much peptide is in a unit, and…
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
The receptor populations that produce satiety and the ones that produce nausea overlap substantially. That is why the ceiling of this drug class is where it is, and it is…
We looked at what the dose-ranging data supports about going higher, and it is thinner and less flattering than the market assumes.