What the new the United Kingdom guidance says about stopping
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
The Ledger Dispatch
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Denmark has declined to reimburse liraglutide in general practice, restricting supply to specialist weight-management services. The appraisal accepted the clinical evidence and turned instead on the cost-effectiveness of an indefinite treatment duration in a population the size of the eligible one.
The carve-out removes cover for approximately 13,000 covered lives with 14 days’ notice. Employees already in treatment are offered a transition period; those in the middle of a titration are not distinguished from those at maintenance dose, which the Journal has asked about.
The structural feature of this market is that the list price and the price actually paid are different numbers, and that the second is contractually confidential in most systems. Any comparison of what a drug costs across countries that relies on published prices is comparing publications. The Journal reports both where it can and says which is which.
Havel Novotný, independent laboratory quality manager, said the duration assumption was doing all the work. "Change the assumed treatment length and the recommendation flips. That is not a criticism of the model; it is what the model is for."
We will follow the re-authorisation reviews, which is where the response criterion begins to bite, and which no published dataset currently covers.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.