The relabeller trading as Vantris Bio enters a consent decree and stops sterile preparation
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
The Ledger Dispatch
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
the United Kingdom has declined to reimburse liraglutide in general practice, restricting supply to specialist weight-management services. The appraisal accepted the clinical evidence and turned instead on the cost-effectiveness of an indefinite treatment duration in a population the size of the eligible one.
The carve-out removes cover for approximately 18,000 covered lives with 25 days’ notice. Employees already in treatment are offered a transition period; those in the middle of a titration are not distinguished from those at maintenance dose, which the Journal has asked about.
The carve-out removes cover for approximately 18,000 covered lives with 25 days’ notice. Employees already in treatment are offered a transition period; those in the middle of a titration are not distinguished from those at maintenance dose, which the Journal has asked about.
The structural feature of this market is that the list price and the price actually paid are different numbers, and that the second is contractually confidential in most systems. Any comparison of what a drug costs across countries that relies on published prices is comparing publications. The Journal reports both where it can and says which is which.
Sinéad Corrigan, patient advocate and former trial participant, said the duration assumption was doing all the work. "Change the assumed treatment length and the recommendation flips. That is not a criticism of the model; it is what the model is for."
Readers whose employer has changed cover are asked to write to the letters desk. We do not publish employer names without documentation.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.