The imaging substudy is an afterthought in the protocol and the centrepiece of the debate
The composition data comes from imaging substudies enrolling a few score participants at selected sites. It is the best evidence available and it is thin.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 10 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
The composition data comes from imaging substudies enrolling a few score participants at selected sites. It is the best evidence available and it is thin.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
What the Journal would want measured before treating this as settled in either direction.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
A great deal of practice has grown up around intermittent schedules. The randomised evidence for any of them is, as far as the Journal can establish, nil.
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
The commonest real-world strategy in this drug class is the least studied one.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.