Every fortnight, every third week, seasonally: an unstudied practice
An absence of evidence is not evidence of harm. It is also not a licence.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 5 of 6 of this archive, newest first.
An absence of evidence is not evidence of harm. It is also not a licence.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
What was pre-specified, what was exploratory, and what was calculated afterwards by people who did not run the trial.
Density is a proxy for strength and an imperfect one, particularly when soft-tissue thickness over the measurement site is changing.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A body-composition report gives four decimal places and no confidence interval. That is the whole difficulty in one sentence.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The gap between a defensible recommendation and a confident one is where most of the harm in this subject lives.
Three different explanations for the same abnormal number, and how to tell them apart.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Where the familiar figures come from, what populations they were measured in, and how far the extrapolation reaches.
The rule that a quarter of weight lost is lean tissue has been in textbooks for decades and does not survive close reading.
These agents produce no dependence and no withdrawal syndrome. What a taper would be for is therefore a real question rather than an obvious one.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.