The dose that got you here and the dose that keeps you here
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 6 of 6 of this archive, newest first.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A survey of the maintenance evidence, which is shorter than the survey of the withdrawal evidence.
What was withdrawn, from whom, after how long, and what was measured afterwards.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
What the labels permit, what clinicians do, and the size of the gap between them.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.