STEP 8 misses on a secondary endpoint the coverage has not mentioned
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 5 of 6 of this archive, newest first.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
What a slow reduction could plausibly buy, and what it certainly cannot prevent.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The evidence base is one secondary analysis, several small studies and a large amount of extrapolation from bariatric surgery.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The assay is not the problem. The interpretation of a lagging integral as a current measurement is the problem.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The recommendation survives scrutiny. The reasoning offered for it frequently does not.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
Every additional analyte raises the probability of a flagged result and lowers the average information content of the panel.