New Zealand declines to reimburse exenatide outside a specialist service
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 6 of 25 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What was withdrawn, from whom, after how long, and what was measured afterwards.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The commonest real-world strategy in this drug class is the least studied one.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Every step between the laboratory report and the product page removes information, and the badge is the last step.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
What the labels permit, what clinicians do, and the size of the gap between them.