What the trials adjudicated, and how
We give background rates alongside trial rates, because an event occurring during treatment is not thereby caused by it.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 3 of 31 of this archive, newest first.
We give background rates alongside trial rates, because an event occurring during treatment is not thereby caused by it.
The central effects are not a bonus. On the current evidence they are the principal mechanism of weight loss.
Where the curve flattens, what flattens with it, and what does not.
The recurring errors in this market are not exotic. They are a small set of arithmetic and reading failures, each capable of moving a dose by a factor of two or ten.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Selectivity, potency and efficacy are three different measurements. The trade routinely reports none of them.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The clinical effect profile is almost fully predictable from where the receptor is expressed, which is unusual and useful.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
Almost every figure in circulation about tolerability comes from six publications. This is what they say.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Three randomised withdrawal designs have tested what happens when treatment stops. Their results are consistent and they are consistently misreported.
The central effects are not a bonus. On the current evidence they are the principal mechanism of weight loss.
A great deal of practice has grown up around intermittent schedules. The randomised evidence for any of them is, as far as the Journal can establish, nil.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
The graduation interval differs between barrel sizes, and a 1 mL barrel is frequently marked in two-unit steps. Reading one as though it were marked in single units halves…
A dual agonist is one molecule with two receptor activities. A co-formulation is two molecules in one pen. The coverage treats them as synonyms.