Six words a verification badge would need to mean anything
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 6 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.
An orthogonal method separates on a different physical principle, so that species co-eluting in the first are likely to resolve in the second. Two runs of the same method at…
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Area per cent silently assumes that every species in the sample absorbs as strongly per unit mass as the parent. For peptide impurities that assumption is usually wrong, and…
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
An orthogonal method separates on a different physical principle, so that species co-eluting in the first are likely to resolve in the second. Two runs of the same method at…
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.
What happens to traceability when bulk material is subdivided, repackaged and relabelled two or three times before sale.
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Every third-party report in this market describes a sample somebody chose to send. That choice is outside the laboratory’s control and outside its records.
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
A document is only as good as the chain that connects it to the material, and most chains here are two or three links longer than the paperwork admits.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
The interval between manufacture and analysis is the most under-read figure on the page, and the one most likely to matter by the time a vial is opened.
Peptide content is the number that tells you how much drug is in the vial. Almost nobody sells it, almost nobody buys it, and when we paid for it on nine vials the results…