What the GIP receptor adds: reading cagrilintide as two drugs in one sequence
Head-to-head data exists for some of these comparisons and not for others. This piece says which.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
An investigational triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist in the TRIUMPH programme.
Head-to-head data exists for some of these comparisons and not for others. This piece says which.
The central effects are not a bonus. On the current evidence they are the principal mechanism of weight loss.
Receptor expression maps explain the effect profile better than any dose-response curve.
The central effects are not a bonus. On the current evidence they are the principal mechanism of weight loss.
Receptor pharmacology explains more of the clinical picture than the dose does — and almost none of it appears in the material patients are given.
A tour of what happens in the thirty seconds after binding, and why it matters at week thirty.
What the in-vitro data supports, what it does not, and where the extrapolation to a person begins.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
Receptor pharmacology explains more of the clinical picture than the dose does — and almost none of it appears in the material patients are given.
The receptor is expressed in more tissues than the popular account allows, and that is the whole story.
A tour of what happens in the thirty seconds after binding, and why it matters at week thirty.
An accumulation model, drawn from published parameters, with its assumptions stated.
Head-to-head data exists for some of these comparisons and not for others. This piece says which.
The exposure curve explains the timing of both the benefit and the side effects. It is almost never shown to the person injecting.
Receptor expression maps explain the effect profile better than any dose-response curve.
A catalogue of open questions, with an assessment of how likely each is to be resolved.
The receptor is expressed in more tissues than the popular account allows, and that is the whole story.
The glucagon arm raises energy expenditure and also raises hepatic glucose output. Balancing those is the whole engineering problem.
What adding GIP activity does, on the current evidence, and what remains unresolved.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.