SURPASS-2 extension data: what happens after the trial stops
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 12 of 68 of this archive, newest first.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Grading six widely repeated claims against the studies actually behind them.
A flag is a probability statement about a population. It is not a statement about the person holding the printout.
We asked twenty companies three questions about stability data and print every answer, refusal and non-response.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
The route did not close because of a rule about peptides.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
The compendial definitions of cold, controlled cold and controlled room temperature permit specified excursions, and knowing the permitted band is the difference between an…
Documentation practice is the only part of vendor quality a buyer can assess before purchase.
The document is four pages. Three of them are about dates.
A proper account of an operation that existed, and of what closing it cost.
Reduced intake is a plausible mechanism for deficiency. Reduced absorption is not, and the two are conflated in most of the advice.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The observation that closes a facility is rarely the dramatic one.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The evidence base is one secondary analysis, several small studies and a large amount of extrapolation from bariatric surgery.
Where two methods disagree, the conservative convention is to report the lower figure. It is not universal, and whether a laboratory follows it belongs on the report.
A design note rather than a result: what the comparator was, and what that permits you to conclude.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.
The supplier has not disputed the finding. It has not explained the gap either.
Storage instructions in this market are close to uniform and almost never accompanied by the study that would justify them. Uniformity is a sign of convention, not of…
Two sources of noise sit under every number: how reproducible the assay is, and how much the analyte varies within the same person on the same day.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Reported from the sessions, and from the two hours afterwards.