Maintenance dosing: what is licensed, what is practised, and what is evidenced
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 13 of 25 of this archive, newest first.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The trials studied planned withdrawal. Almost nobody stops that way.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Every third-party report in this market describes a sample somebody chose to send. That choice is outside the laboratory’s control and outside its records.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.