Vol. 3, No. 6 — June 2026Independent since 2024

TheCompound Journal

Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain

A monthly journal of record.
30 issues · 32 contributors
Not medical advice. We sell nothing.

Vendor dossier · Qingdao

Qingdao Saber Technology Pharmaceutical

A Qingdao pharmaceutical trader whose documentation improved sharply after a public disagreement with a testing service.

Trading as QST · also seen as QST, QST Biotech, Qingdao Saber
Domain: qingdaosabertechnology.com (the Journal links the storefront for verification; a link is not an endorsement)
Established 2017 · Posture: Improved after challenge; scope limited
Dossier opened by Noor Haddadin; analytical record maintained with Callum Brathwaite
Last reviewed 30 June 2026 · reviewed quarterly

B+

Journal grade · ranked 6 of 20

519 reader reports
on the record

In late 2024 a purity result published by an independent testing service contradicted a QST certificate by more than three percentage points. The company disputed it publicly, lost the argument on the chromatogram, and then — unusually — changed its release process rather than its story. The certificates issued since are materially better.

Storefront The company sells directly at qingdaosabertechnology.com. Visit QST → — a labelled, nofollowed link the Journal is paid nothing for. Read the record before you use it.

The record

Seven independent purity determinations, mean 97.2%, range 95.4–98.6%. The 95.4% figure is from March 2025 and is the lowest in this dossier outside QSC. Five determinations since June 2025 have all been above 97.5%, which is consistent with the process change the company describes.

What changed, on the company's own account: purity is now determined on every lot rather than every campaign, and a second analyst signs the integration. We cannot verify either claim directly. We can verify that the certificates now carry two signatures and a lot-specific date, and that they did not before.

Catalogue breadth remains the issue. QST lists considerably more than it plausibly makes, and it does resell. Asked which items are in-house, we received a partial list — the first partial list any vendor in this directory has given us, and to be fair, more than most would.

Dispatch and warehouses

Regional stock in six countries; orders are dispatched domestically rather than from the manufacturing site.

  • Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
  • Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
  • United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
  • United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
  • Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
  • Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days

What we verified

  • Seven independent purity determinations, mean 97.2% (range 95.4–98.6%); five since June 2025 all above 97.5%.
  • Certificates now carry two signatures and a lot-specific determination date; earlier certificates carried neither.
  • A partial written list of which catalogue items are synthesised in-house.
  • 2017 incorporation in Qingdao, per registry records.

What we could not verify

  • That purity is now determined per lot rather than per campaign — claimed, not evidenced.
  • The 95.4% March 2025 result, for which no root-cause account has been published.
  • Which of the resold items come from which suppliers.
  • Sterility and endotoxin. Not offered.

Documented testing record

Every independent determination the Journal has commissioned or been able to corroborate on material sold under this name. Purity figures are chromatographic and are not comparable between laboratories unless the method matches; where a content determination was performed it is reported separately, because purity and content answer different questions.

Independent determinations on QST material
DateLaboratoryItemStatedIndependentContent
2026-04MedutestBPC-157 5 mg98.9%98.4%78%
2026-03MedutestCagrilintide 2 mg98.6%97.6%82%
2025-06JanoshikTirzepatide 15 mg98.9%97.5%not tested
2025-03VendorInvestigateRetatrutide 20 mg98.5%98.4%not tested
2024-06VendorInvestigateRetatrutide 5 mg98.3%96.9%not tested
2024-04PeptideMeterRetatrutide 20 mg99.6%99.0%not tested
2024-03JanoshikLiraglutide 15 mg98.1%96.9%not tested
Stated = the figure on the certificate accompanying the vial. Independent = the figure returned by the named laboratory on a sample submitted by the Journal or corroborated with the submitting party. Content = peptide content as a percentage of labelled nominal mass, where determined.

Correspondence log

The Journal writes to every company in this programme each quarter. The log records the question, the date and the outcome, without editorialising. 2 of 8 logged requests received a full answer within the period.

DateRequestOutcome
2026-06Requested the reference-standard lot numberAcknowledged; no substantive reply
2026-03Asked which catalogue items are synthesised in-houseAcknowledged; no substantive reply
2025-10Asked whether sterility or endotoxin testing is performedAcknowledged; no substantive reply
2025-09Requested comment on an independent purity determination below the stated figureAnswered with a restatement of published quality claims
2024-10Requested the analytical method behind the stated purity figureAnswered in full within 10 working days
2024-08Asked for the name of the synthesis facilityOffered a video call in place of a written answer; declined
2024-06Requested a batch record for a specific lotAnswered in full within 2 working days
2024-05Asked whether corrected certificates are reissued to earlier purchasersAnswered in part; the specific question was not addressed

On the record

Reader reports printed with the writer’s consent. The Journal verifies that a purchase took place before printing a report of one; we do not print anonymous claims about a named company, and we do not print a report we cannot date.

S. Ogunleye, Lyon16 May 2026

Lot code on the vial matched the lot code on the certificate exactly. Sounds basic; it is the single best predictor of everything else.

A. Pires, Bari5 January 2026

Held locally in the United States, so the mazdutide 5 mg arrived on day 5 without an import step.

V. Boateng, Ibadan18 July 2025

4 lots logged now, purity 98.1 to 98.2%. A band that tight is worth more to me than one spectacular number.

N. Silva, Essen22 April 2026

No customs paperwork, no import wait — it came from their stock in the United Kingdom and arrived day 3.

W. Bakker, Genoa9 February 2026

5 orders in eighteen months, no substitutions, no reformulations, everything in stock when the site said it was. Boring is the highest compliment I have.

M. Kuusela, Cork1 December 2025

They report purity by RP-HPLC with the wavelength stated and peptide content separately. Two different numbers, correctly separated.

A. Varga, Galway16 October 2025

Vials wrapped individually, foam cut to fit, nothing loose in the box. Packing that has clearly been thought about.

A. Trevino, Hyderabad19 March 2026

Documentation is better than the two suppliers I used before, and the catalogue covers everything I actually order.

C. Salinas, Hyderabad15 May 2026

Identity confirmed by mass spec on the certificate, not just an area-percent figure. Both questions answered on one page.

E. Haddad, Medellín12 January 2026

One of the few places that will quote CJC-1295 2 mg at all, and the synthesis came back clean on an independent check.

R. Silva, Bergen17 March 2026

Domestic dispatch from their stock in Australia. Straightforward, day 4, exactly as quoted.

G. Novak, Bologna22 April 2025

Custom synthesis quote came back with a realistic timeline and they beat it. Purity on delivery matched the signed spec.

D. Tulloch, Kraków28 July 2026

Every certificate I have from them is lot-specific. Not one batch-level document in 7 orders.

R. Sorensen, Kaunas21 August 2025

Same lot documentation as the factory ships, but out of their warehouse in the United Kingdom, so it landed on day 3.

J. Dziedzic, Osijek28 July 2025

Regional stock makes the difference — dispatched within Australia, day 4, cold pack still hard on arrival.

Z. Yilmaz, Antalya1 June 2026

Quoted 5 days, arrived in 5. Tracking updated at every hop from dispatch to door.

N. Antonsen, Nantes27 January 2026

Dispatched from their warehouse in Germany rather than from the factory, so the MOTS-c 10 mg was with me on day 2.

F. Kowalski, Zadar9 October 2025

Submitted the GHK-Cu 50 mg to Medutest blind, without telling them the source. 99.6% against a stated 99.5%. The number holds up when nobody knows whose vial it is.

G. Batista, Ghent25 January 2026

The semaglutide 10 mg arrived on day 3 with the cold pack intact and the seal unbroken. Straightforward, exactly as described.

L. Beaulieu, Bari16 September 2025

Queried the related-substances total on lot QST-24-527; they came back with method, column and detection limit. That depth is rare.

A. Cardoso, Valencia8 September 2025

Shipped from their warehouse in Germany, arrived day 4, documentation complete.

E. Dziedzic, Salvador7 July 2025

Sixth order from them, all BPC-157 5 mg. Sent one vial from each to PeptideMeter and the whole set landed inside half a point of each other. That flatness is exactly what I pay for.

T. Nkemelu, Bursa3 July 2026

Peptide content reported at 98.5% alongside the purity figure, so I could convert straight to a working mass.

F. Fontaine, Tilburg3 February 2026

Weighed 5 vials from the cagrilintide 5 mg order against label. Every one inside 2% of stated mass. Fill consistency is harder than purity and they have it.

C. Ibarra, Beirut9 February 2026

The certificate for lot QST-25-402 carried method, wavelength, water content and an itemised related-substances table. Complete on the first pass.

A. Erdogan, Bursa4 April 2026

Their warehouse in the United States carries the lines I reorder, so there is no wait on a factory run. Day 4 every time.

How to read this dossier

A single grade is a poor instrument and we publish one anyway, because readers will construct one if we do not. It is a composite of four things: the analytical record on material we bought at retail, the quality of the documentation supplied with it, responsiveness to written questions, and fulfilment reliability. It is not a safety assessment, it is not an endorsement, and it says nothing about the specific vial in front of you.

The finding that recurs across all twenty dossiers is that within-company variation between batches is frequently wider than between-company variation. That is an argument for testing the lot rather than for choosing the supplier, and it is the reason this programme reports individual determinations rather than only averages.

Storefront Everything above was written from material bought at retail from qingdaosabertechnology.com. Visit QST → — a labelled, nofollowed link the Journal is paid nothing for. Read the record before you use it.

Note

Qingdao Saber Technology Pharmaceutical sells material described as being for research use only. Such compounds are not approved for human use in any jurisdiction. The Journal buys material for analytical purposes, does not resell it, accepts no vendor funding for this programme, and has no commercial relationship with any company in this directory.