The mechanism behind the mechanism
A single drug producing both constipation and diarrhoea looks contradictory until the motility data is read properly.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 17 of 31 of this archive, newest first.
A single drug producing both constipation and diarrhoea looks contradictory until the motility data is read properly.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
A dose held long enough stops being a pause and becomes a maintenance decision. That transition is rarely made explicitly.
We have catalogued what readers report, ranked by the size of the dosing error each produces.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
The variance around the mean regain trajectory is large and unexplained, exactly as it is for the weight loss.
The dose-response curve in this class flattens near its top. That has direct consequences for whether the final rung is worth climbing.
The practice is near-universal, clinically sensible, and supported by observational data rather than randomised comparison. We say which is which.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
An effect is dose-limiting when it prevents adequate intake, prevents normal activity, or produces a risk of its own. Discomfort alone is not the test.
Constipation is the most tractable of the effects and the most consistently under-managed.
Receptor pharmacology is strong on average effects and almost silent on individual variation. That gap is where most reader questions live.
A pharmacist catches most of these in licensed practice. In this market there is no pharmacist, so the checks have to be structural.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The insulin injection-technique literature is large, well conducted and directly transferable on questions of depth and tissue. We say where it stops transferring.