Side effects, cost, supply, target: four reasons with four trajectories
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 18 of 31 of this archive, newest first.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
The trials studied planned withdrawal. Almost nobody stops that way.
What a slow reduction could plausibly buy, and what it certainly cannot prevent.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The ceiling varies severalfold between people, and nothing measurable at baseline predicts where it sits.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Trial discontinuation figures are a floor, not an estimate: trial populations are supported in ways ordinary patients are not.
Every major phase 3 protocol in this class allowed escalation to be delayed for tolerability. Almost no product label explains the mechanics of doing so.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
What the trials measured was continuation against withdrawal. What patients want to know is continuation at a lower dose, and that study has largely not been done.
Higher doses of these molecules have been studied. In general they produced modest additional efficacy and disproportionate additional symptom burden, which is why the…
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
A plateau at an intermediate dose and a plateau at the maximum dose look identical from the outside and mean different things.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
The convention — resume lower, re-escalate — is not caution. It follows directly from the elimination half-life.
The evidence base is thin and the document says so, which is to its credit.
Pancreatitis is rare, was adjudicated in the outcome programmes, and did not show the imbalance early case reports suggested.