The reference change value: the number that tells you whether a delta is real
A flag is a probability statement about a population. It is not a statement about the person holding the printout.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 2 of 2 of this archive, newest first.
A flag is a probability statement about a population. It is not a statement about the person holding the printout.
Two sources of noise sit under every number: how reproducible the assay is, and how much the analyte varies within the same person on the same day.
Asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation is common on treatment and is not pancreatitis. The distinction is clinical, not biochemical.
What the SURPASS and STEP programmes reported, with the estimands and the baseline values stated.
The arithmetic of the reference change value, worked for the analytes that matter here.
The panel drawn during a week of vomiting is measuring the vomiting.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate is a calculation with muscle mass in the denominator of its assumptions. In this population that matters.
Timing is the whole of the post-cessation panel: draw it too early and it measures the treatment period.
The panel drawn during a week of vomiting is measuring the vomiting.
The arithmetic of the reference change value, worked for the analytes that matter here.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.
Which movements are expected, which resolve, and which warrant investigation.
Three different explanations for the same abnormal number, and how to tell them apart.
A robust, cheap, standardised assay with a specific and well-catalogued set of failure modes, several of which are common in this population.
Asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation is common on treatment and is not pancreatitis. The distinction is clinical, not biochemical.
A substantial proportion of the abnormal results generated during rapid weight loss are consequences of the weight loss rather than findings about the person.
Which markers are informative, which are confounded, and which move for reasons unrelated to nutrition.
What the trials measured, which in the case of micronutrients is very little.
A substantial proportion of the abnormal results generated during rapid weight loss are consequences of the weight loss rather than findings about the person.