Japan caps semaglutide prescribing to 13 specialist centres
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 10 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A supply interruption is a discontinuation with no notice, no taper and no plan. That is a distinct clinical situation.
The Journal submitted split samples from single lots to three assay services, under names unconnected to this publication, and published each method alongside each result.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.