Side effects, cost, supply, target: four reasons with four trajectories
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 9 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
Real-world persistence figures, with their definitions stated, because the definitions are doing most of the work.
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
A badge asserts that something was tested. It does not assert what, when, on whose sample, by what method, or whether the lot on sale is the lot that was tested.
Why the reason for stopping changes what happens afterwards.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Duplicate submissions under different names test within-laboratory repeatability, which is a different quantity from between-laboratory reproducibility.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
What a verification mark would have to carry to be checkable: a date, a lot, a method, a submitter and a link to the report.