Sweden caps liraglutide prescribing to 10 specialist centres
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Page 8 of 10 of this archive, newest first.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Chain of custody, in a regulated setting, begins at sampling. Here it begins when the package arrives.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
The evidence on stopping is better than the evidence on almost anything else in this field, because somebody deliberately randomised it.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The regain trajectories, arm by arm, with the estimands named.
Every withdrawal trial compared full dose against nothing. The clinically interesting comparison — full dose against a reduced one — has not been randomised.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The Journal does not treat a badge as evidence and states so wherever it reports one.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
The trials studied planned withdrawal. Almost nobody stops that way.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.
What a laboratory can and cannot know about the provenance, storage history and representativeness of what lands on its bench.
Every third-party report in this market describes a sample somebody chose to send. That choice is outside the laboratory’s control and outside its records.
Two years ago we ran an anonymised version of this comparison and promised a named one. This is it, with every method printed in full.
Efficacy was never the question in this appraisal. Duration of treatment was.