How a claim degrades between the bench and the listing
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
TheCompound Journal
Reporting on incretins, compounding & the peptide supply chain
Testing Dispatch
The Journal submitted the sample and paid for the analysis. The vendor was told in advance.
Medutest has published a purity determination of 95.6% on a 10 mg vial of semaglutide supplied by KP, against a figure of 94.1% on the certificate that accompanied the vial. The sample was submitted by the Journal in October 2025 as part of a continuing programme of arm’s-length purchasing, and the vendor was told before the order was placed that any result would be published.
The Journal purchased 1600 vials from the same lot and had 17 of them analysed separately, in order to distinguish vial-to-vial variation from method variation. Vial-to-vial agreement was within 0.4 percentage points. Method-to-method disagreement was an order of magnitude larger.
Reported figures across the set were: highest 95.6%, lowest 94.1%, median close to the midpoint of the two. Every report in the set stated a detection wavelength, and 17 of them stated an integration threshold. The Journal has asked the laboratory to publish thresholds on all reports as a matter of routine.
Discrepancies of one to two percentage points between a supplier’s figure and an independent determination are common and usually explicable: a faster gradient resolves fewer impurities, a higher integration threshold discards more small peaks, and a wider solvent-front exclusion window removes early-eluting fragments from the calculation altogether. None of that is misconduct. All of it is invisible unless the method is disclosed.
"The useful thing in that report is not the percentage, it is the system suitability data," said Yusuf Kandemir, freight and customs broker, Istanbul. "It is the only part that tells you whether the percentage means anything."
KP’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.
Lot-level verification with a public report is a real and achievable thing. It exists in this market, on a minority of listings.
The result is unremarkable. What the report omits is not.
A result on one vial generalises to a batch only if the vial was drawn in a way that makes it representative — and nobody records how it was drawn.
Reported from the analysis, not from a warning notice.
We submitted vials for endotoxin determination and report the results, the method and the laboratory, because a pyrogen figure without a method is as empty as a purity…
An in-use period is established by a dedicated study on a specific formulation in a specific container at a specific concentration. Borrowing one from a marketed product is…