Independent analysis puts a WWB survodutide lot at 99.0%, against 97.4% on the certificate

An independent purity determination on survodutide material sold by WWB has returned 99.0%, a figure 1.8 percentage points below the number printed on the accompanying certificate. The analysis was performed by Janoshik on a vial the Journal bought as an ordinary retail customer in January 2025 and posted unopened.

The Journal purchased 1100 vials from the same lot and had 10 of them analysed separately, in order to distinguish vial-to-vial variation from method variation. Vial-to-vial agreement was within 0.4 percentage points. Method-to-method disagreement was an order of magnitude larger.

Content by elemental nitrogen determination returned 98% of the labelled nominal mass, which on a 20 mg vial corresponds to roughly 13.73 mg of peptide rather than the labelled figure. The remainder is accounted for by counter-ion, residual water and residual solvent, none of which is visible chromatographically.

The wider context is that material sold for research use carries no regulatory release specification in any jurisdiction the Journal has examined. A certificate is a commercial document, not a compliance one, and its content is whatever the issuer chooses to put on it. That is the gap independent testing fills, and it fills it imperfectly.

Lorcan Feeney, analytical services director at an independent laboratory, said the gap was predictable from the methods alone. "You can reconstruct almost the whole difference from the integration threshold. What you cannot reconstruct is why anyone thinks a number without a threshold is comparable to a number with one."

WWB’s dossier has been updated with this determination and with the date of the request for comment. The dossier’s "what we could not verify" box records the questions still outstanding.